-
Website
http://www.buzzbishop.com/ -
Original page
http://www.buzzbishop.com/blog/2008/07/18/do-square-watermelons-taste-better/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Bill
1 comment · 1 points
-
devon1975
1 comment · 1 points
-
eringee
1 comment · 1 points
-
davingreenwell
1 comment · 1 points
-
tinybites
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
AMP Radio Calgary Show Notes 12.29.09
2 hours ago · 1 comment
-
Homesick
6 days ago · 4 comments
-
Merry Christmas
4 days ago · 1 comment
-
Back Behind The Mic
3 weeks ago · 4 comments
-
Moving Road Movie
3 weeks ago · 4 comments
-
AMP Radio Calgary Show Notes 12.29.09
http://www.financialhack.com/2007/12/04/10145_l...
while i appreciate the creativity at conserving shelf space in japan, i just dont see the rationale behind shipping a $100 vanity watermelon across the ocean to vancouver.
it's a watermelon! do we really need a square watermelon to demonstrate our hip superiority to our friends?
i mean, if they're so cool, why can't we just grow them like that here?
Even if North American consumers and businesses *needed* square watermelons (let's say for reasons similar to the space constraints in Japan as Rebecca's link reports), it makes more sense to have local growers adopt the necessary methodologies to shape them like that in North America.
Personally, I wouldn't shell out $100 on shoes, let alone an angular watermelon.
The secret is volume: the biggest container ships carry 7000 containers at a time, and note that a standard (2 TEU) container is 40'x8'x8'. So one container can carry, hm, let's pretend it's 1 cubic foot, because that's close and convenient.
So roughly 2400 watermelons will fit in a container, which is something like 1/7000 of the container ship's cargo capacity.
That ship would use about 350 metric tons of diesel fuel per day, and take about 15 days to make the Japan-Canada trip.
yadda yadda, the melon on Phil's desk consumed about 0.3 kg of diesel fuel on its trip from japan, which is about 0.35 litres of gas. How fuel-efficient is the car you drove to the grocery store, or to work for that matter?
Lessons to be learned: math is hard, but vital. Ships are more fuel-efficient than cars. Do not be deceived by your visceral sentiments.
I impress my friends with my BMW, my Manolo Blahniks, my Prada bag, and 2 Karat Diamond engagement ring.
All waste of money in my opinion...
So, if people are impressed with this crap they adorn themselves with...why WOULDN'T they be impressed with this.
Some...people...are...idiots. Lets face it.
There were apparently only 400 available for North America, so it hardly seems like they're saving the shipping costs eh? Did they put 'em in containers alongside Mazda's?
Plus they had to be shipped from the square watermelon factory in Japan to the ship - and then taken off and shipped to the stores in North America.
That seems like larger carbon footprint than a truckload from Chilliwack. Thank God for little pleasures like Fiji Spring Water.
Long version? A consumer can swamp the logistical "carbon footprint" of this melon with their method of getting the melon home, assuming certain fairly plausible parameters for how they get to the store and how far they traveled.
Slate recycles the analysis of how stuff gets moved, this time in a discussion of Netflix DVDs.
You can grow them yourself, just grow the melon in a square plexiglass container.
They've been doing this since the early 80's.